<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spinning Spammers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leahjoseph.com/2007/11/16/spinning-spammers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leahjoseph.com/2007/11/16/spinning-spammers/</link>
	<description>Married life down under</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://leahjoseph.com/2007/11/16/spinning-spammers/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 03:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leahjoseph.com/2007/11/16/spinning-spammers/#comment-352</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m totally against copying blog posts, I don&#039;t really understand the point. I mean, what does the splogger get out of it? And does the original blogger really lose out? I mean, I read the example and the splogged entry made no sense, so I can&#039;t see that people would actually go visit that site anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m totally against copying blog posts, I don&#8217;t really understand the point. I mean, what does the splogger get out of it? And does the original blogger really lose out? I mean, I read the example and the splogged entry made no sense, so I can&#8217;t see that people would actually go visit that site anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
