<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copycat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leahjoseph.com/2007/09/16/copycat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leahjoseph.com/2007/09/16/copycat/</link>
	<description>Married life down under</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 07:08:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ging</title>
		<link>http://leahjoseph.com/2007/09/16/copycat/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>ging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leahjoseph.com/2007/09/16/copycat/#comment-239</guid>
		<description>I have read his emails.  Got irked as well.  I hope he has read your reminder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read his emails.  Got irked as well.  I hope he has read your reminder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://leahjoseph.com/2007/09/16/copycat/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leahjoseph.com/2007/09/16/copycat/#comment-238</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s almost impossible to stop plagiarism if it&#039;s being done deliberately. But if that person is just too lazy to link back, maybe you can make the &quot;Share this&quot; function more intuitive by separating out the &quot;E-mail&quot; component.

Another thing you can do is add a line just below the title (or somewhere in the body of the article) which has some kind of reference or link back to the site. Don&#039;t put it at the end because that&#039;s too easy to remove when cutting and pasting. If the person still removes the link even though it&#039;s in the middle of the article, they&#039;re probably doing it deliberately and there isn&#039;t much you can do about it, unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost impossible to stop plagiarism if it&#8217;s being done deliberately. But if that person is just too lazy to link back, maybe you can make the &#8220;Share this&#8221; function more intuitive by separating out the &#8220;E-mail&#8221; component.</p>
<p>Another thing you can do is add a line just below the title (or somewhere in the body of the article) which has some kind of reference or link back to the site. Don&#8217;t put it at the end because that&#8217;s too easy to remove when cutting and pasting. If the person still removes the link even though it&#8217;s in the middle of the article, they&#8217;re probably doing it deliberately and there isn&#8217;t much you can do about it, unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
